On Friday, June 11, 2004, a Texas jury delivered a stunning verdict, bringing the two-week trial of two foundation officials to a dramatic conclusion.. The suit was brought by the Texas Attorney General and the Foundation’s new board of directors against Carl Yeckel and Thomas Vett, former officers of the Dallas-based Carl B. and Florence E. King Foundation. The Attorney General claimed that the compensation and expense reimbursements paid to these two individuals were excessive. The jury
| The Desktop Guide is Quickly Becoming the Must Have Guide for Nonprofit Executives Jack Siegel's new book, A Desktop Guide for Nonprofit Directors, Officers, and Advisors: Avoiding Trouble While Doing Good, has quickly become the go to guide for nonprofit executives and advisors. So what are people saying about the Guide? When our Jack Siegel introduced himself to one of the leading authorities on the law of federal tax exemption after she had made a presentation at a recent conference, the speaker said, "You're the 'Jack' in the Guide! We are fighting over your Guide in our office." A second speaker held the book up to two people who were asking questions after her presentation, exclaiming "I love this book. I tell everyone at conferences to buy it." One state charity regulator has indicated that the Guide is great and has recommended it to her fellow regulators. Some of our readers have followed the link to the Amazon.com Web site, but apparently have not bought the Guide. If they were turned off by the price, they should reconsider. One prominent attorney in the exempt organization field grabbed a review copy of the Guide and couldn't put it down. She has instructed a number of her clients to buy it, pointing out to them that for less than 1/2 hour of her billable time, they receive a lesson (and resource) that tells it like she would like it told. If you are starting a new charity, the Guide could save you thousands of dollars in legal fees by teaching you how to better utilize your legal counsel and framing the issues so you don't spin your wheels at $400 an hour. Buy your copy today at Amazon.com. Barnes & Noble, or John Wiley (the publisher). |
agreed, deciding Yeckel and Vett should repay over $7.5 million to the Foundation. The jury then slapped the two with $14 million in punitive damages.
Executives of non-profits, particularly private foundations, should view this decision as an important milestone. Over the last several years, a number of private foundations have received criticism about what some view as excessive compensation and perks. You can expect other state charity officials to be inspired by the King Foundation decision. As just one example, the Boston Globe, in reporting on the King Foundation verdict, added the following to mix:
The abuses at the King Foundation were detailed in a Globe Spotlight series last year, which also revealed that Paul C. Cabot Jr. of Needham had been taking more than $1 million in annual pay from his family foundation, whose assets had dwindled to less than $5 million by last year. Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly is investigating the Cabot trust. (our emphasis)
From Beth Healy, Ex-Officers Ordered to Pay $14m in Texas Charity Fraud, June 15, 2004 Boston Globe
We do not know the specific circumstances surrounding the Cabot trust. Mr. Cabot may have a legitimate basis for his salary. What is significant to us is the fact that the Massachusetts Attorney General is willing to investigate.
The facts in executive compensation cases make for eye-catching headlines, particularly when the salaries and perks are large. Those headlines makes these cases particularly appealing to state attorneys general, most of whom are elected officials.
A word to the wise: If you want to keep your large salary, make sure an independent board approves it after full and fair disclosure. Even then, you had better be able to justify the salary through comparables from other similarly-situated non-profits and demonstrated and documented work on your part. Don’t forget the New York State Attorney General has a bigger fish (Richard Grasso) on the line (waiting trial in a civil suit). In short, there is a growing willingness to investigate and prosecute.
THE FOREGOING IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS LEGAL ADVICE. IF LEGAL ADVICE IS REQUIRED, THE NON-PROFIT OR OTHER PARTY IN QUESTION SHOULD SEEK THE ADVICE OF QUALIFIED LEGAL COUNSEL.
Comments