MICHAEL, WHAT’S THE RUSH?
DATELINE: April 16, 2008, Chicago
The New York Times Freakonomics blog is reporting that Michael, a 31-year old Harvard University graduate, faces a problem. He is about to inherit an unspecified amount of money and wants to give $70 million to worthy causes. The Chronicle of Philanthropy's Give and Take column posed the question: Where should Michael donate his money? Not surprisingly, the story has generated what would appear to be record number of comments. Many suggest that Michael give his money...
The Desktop Guide is Quickly Becoming the Must Have Guide for Nonprofit Executives
Some of our readers have followed the link to the Amazon.com Web site, but apparently have not bought the Guide. If they were turned off by the price, they should reconsider. One prominent attorney in the exempt organization field grabbed a review copy of the Guide and couldn't put it down. She has instructed a number of her clients to buy it, pointing out to them that for less than 1/2 hour of her billable time, they receive a lesson (and resource) that tells it like she would like it told. If you are starting a new charity, the Guide could save you thousands of dollars in legal fees by teaching you how to better utilize your legal counsel and framing the issues so you don't spin your wheels at $400 an hour. |
to their favorite cause.
We think Michael should get himself a good lawyer and investment advisor, if he doesn't have advisors already. We then suggest that Michael cool his jets. He has his entire lifetime to give his money away, but once he parts with it, he can't get it back. We would hate to see Michael living on a subway grate at 45, 65, or 85, regretting his earlier decision. Michael strikes us as no different than a child star or professional athlete. Those folks can make a lot of money in a short period of time. They appear to be rich, but unless they save and invest wisely, they may not be able to sustain a lifestyle to which they became quickly accustomed.
Michael should avoid impulsive behavior. He has already made his first mistake by sharing too much information with someone who has advertised his problem, albeit at Michael's suggestion. We bet there are already charities and others trying to identify Michael so that they can sink their avaricious claws into him and his money.
This is not to say that Michael shouldn't give to charity. But we would like to see a little more concern on the part of those who want Michael's money about Michael's long-term well being. Donors are not just suckers to be picked clean. There are two sides to the giving transaction. In our view—and this is the real point of this post—ethical charities should be concerned that the giving experience is just as rewarding for the donor as the recipient. They should also be concerned about the donor's well being after the donation. Michael may find at age 35 or 45 that he believes the best way to serve humanity is to start a company, invent a new product, or invest in a venture. It would be a shame if Michael couldn't do that because he had acted too quickly.
We can say one thing for sure: Michael's quandary sure doesn't say much for a Harvard education. You would think that someone who had the opportunity to attend one of the world's great universities would have developed some interests and ideas from the experience? Didn't an art history, sociology, international relations, religion, economics, health, performing arts, literature, or science course develop any appreciation or sense of how Michael might want to benefit the world? In some part, Michael's shallowness is his own fault. In the end, if you have to ask other people where you should give your money, you need to grow up before you make any decisions. In fact, Michael's question reeks of arrogance, particularly when he says he isn't sure whether he needs to give away $70 million or $50 million, iwth a laugh.
Our final question: How does Michael know that he soon will inherit money. After reading his quandry in the New York Times, maybe someone will decide to rewrite his or her will. One can only hope.
And one for the road: Does Michael exist, or is he just a device to spark some discussion?
Internal Revenue Service - Circular 230 Disclosure: As provided for in Treasury regulations, any advice (but none is intended) relating to federal taxes that is contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any plan or arrangement addressed herein.
THE FOREGOING IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS LEGAL ADVICE. IF LEGAL ADVICE IS REQUIRED, THE NONPROFIT OR OTHER PARTY IN QUESTION SHOULD SEEK THE ADVICE OF QUALIFIED LEGAL COUNSEL. If you liked this post, please visit http://www.charitygovernance.com for a description of our training and consulting services. You will also want to acquire a copy of Jack Siegel's book, A Desktop Guide for Nonprofit Directors, Officers, and Advisors: Avoiding Trouble While Doing Good."
Copyright 2008, Charity Governance Consulting LLC. All Rights Reserved. You may not copy any portion of this post to a computer "clipboard" for re-posting anywhere or e-mailing, or otherwise reproduce this post. If you want others to review this post, you may provide them with a link to this web blog. Any use of the material or ideas in this post by reporters or other publishers shall make reference to Jack Siegel, author of "A Guide for Non-Profit Directors, Officers and Advisors: Avoiding Trouble While Doing Good" and this web blog. For additional information call 773-325-2124
